Send article
i

The Public Law Journal of the Universidad de Chile invites national and foreign authors to participate in the next issue of the Journal, corresponding to the second semester of 2024.

Articles must conform to the editorial guidelines, which can be found at: https://revistaderechopublico.uchile.cl/index.php/RDPU/about/submissions

The papers are subjected to a blind peer review process.

 

Judicial review of notice-and-comment rulemaking: the case of the environmental rules

Authors

  • José Luis Corvalán Pérez Abogado, Master of Laws, Harvard University
No. 83 (2015): 2do semestre
https://doi.org/10.5354/rdpu.v0i83.39347

Abstract

Until 2014, the judicial review of the environmental rules was highly deferential, remarking the discretionary nature of the rulemaking authority of the President. However, this deferential trend was halted by a decision delivered by the Second Environmental Court in December 2014, invalidating the new Primary Standard of Environmental Quality for Particulate Matter MP10, which later was upheld by the Chilean Supreme Court. As we will explore below, these decisions closely resemble the hard look review currently employed by the American courts to scrutiny notice-and-comment rulemaking in the United States.

Keywords:

Judicial review, environmental rules, notice-and-comment, rulemaking, deference

Downloads

Altmetrics
How to Cite
Corvalán Pérez, J. L. (2016). Judicial review of notice-and-comment rulemaking: the case of the environmental rules. Revista De Derecho Público, (83), pág. 11–36. https://doi.org/10.5354/rdpu.v0i83.39347
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
 
Revista de Derecho Público
Facultad de Derecho
Universidad de Chile
DATOS DE INVESTIGACIÓN
Dirección de Servicios de Información y Bibliotecas (SISIB)